Return to
Dr.Progresso Reviews
| KING CRIMSON: IN THE COURT OF THE
CRIMSON KING (Virgin 7243 8 48099 2 8) [1969]
Starting with IN THE COURT OF THE CRIMSON KING in 1999, and continuing with the next three albums (as they were originally released) in 2000, Robert Fripp and Simon Heyworth have produced 24-bit remastered "30th Anniversary Editions" of these albums on CD. (These are the third versions of these albums to appear on CD. The first CDs were taken directly from LP-equalized masters. The second round of CDs were "Definitive Editions" remastered under Robert Fripps supervision and released in the late eighties.) Subsequent albums from the seventies and eighties are due to follow in this format. And the initial releases are in the "mini-LP" format popularized in Japan. (After the initial "mini-LP" versions are sold out which is occurring rapidly these CDs will be re-released in regular jewel boxes.)
Its nice to have miniature replicas of these original gatefold albums, complete with the hard-to-read silver type over blue inside POSEIDON, and the illuminated letters of LIZARD. They also come with booklets (tucked into the pocket opposite that which holds the CD) which are scrapbooks of King Crimsons contemporary press coverage. I was curious to see how theyd handle the ISLANDS package, since it had different covers in the U.S. and the U.K. In its "mini-LP" version it comes with the British outer slipsleeve as its cover, and the American cover (swapped up for down and front for back) on the booklet (the booklets for the other albums simply duplicate the "mini-LP" covers). This roughly duplicates the U.K. LP. Far more important than the packaging of these albums, however, are the contents. The music remains as powerfully compelling as it was thirty years ago, and it has never been presented to better advantage. Working with tapes which were perhaps not originally recorded under the most ideal conditions, Fripp and Heyworth have worked minor miracles of transparency and clarity and theyve restored lost dynamic range although, surprisingly, the CDs are actually mastered at a lower volume level than is customary. This is particularly noticeable on "The Devils Triangle" on POSEIDON, which starts inaudibly and very slowly fades up into listening range as it continues to build.
These first four albums both defined King Crimson and set the stage for what was to follow. Listening to them again Im reminded of how broadly musical this Crimson was. Although the original band recorded only the first album before breaking up, the next two albums (both released in 1970!) were made by a superb studio crew. They included important contributions from British avant-jazz pianist Keith Tippet, and, in addition to the saxes and flutes of Mel Collins (who replaced Ian McDonald on those instruments, absorbed the Crimson vocabulary and made it his own on three albums and in the 1971/72 working band), other horns were used: trumpet, trombone, oboe and English horn. As Ive observed elsewhere here, this was "programmatic music," solidly in the European tradition of Romantic classical music. This was music which told a story and evoked visual imagery. It ranged from loud and heavy to quiet and pretty and used modal themes to build in intensity a logical extension of the ground-breaking coda to the Beatles "Hey Jude" in 1968. In places the music could approach (controlled) chaos, and tracks like "Cat Food" offered openly experimental instrumental sections. King Crimson could in those days be stunning in its musical power, which went so far beyond rock and roll as to make the descriptive word "rock" virtually irrelevant. These four albums created "progressive rock" and had an enormous influence on other ambitious bands throughout the world.
King Crimsons influence did not stop with those first four albums, either. The fifth, LARKS TONGUES IN ASPIC, marked a dramatic turn away from programmatic music, toward a much more abstract music, as exemplified by pieces like "Fracture." Working with a completely new band, Robert Fripp moved away as much as he could from the anthemic style of the earlier Crimson, but not so far as to totally distance Crimson from its past. There was still a Crimsoid sound and approach. And violinist David Cross and bassist John Wetton demonstrated their thorough grounding in the Crimsoid vocabulary, especially in the recorded improvisations. Many people celebrate the Larks Tongues band as the best of all the Crimsons. But Fripp gave that up in 1974, disbanding King Crimson and leaving music entirely for an extended sabbatical. I think hed had enough of Crimson and its extended works. When he released his solo album, EXPOSURE, in 1979 the tracks were short and post-punky. The one bow in the direction of Crimson, "Breathless," offered Crimsoid riffs but no Crimsoid power and no real development only riffs. I met Robert shortly after EXPOSURE was released (and Id given it a mixed review in a local entertainment paper, the UNICORN TIMES, which hed seen and did not agree with) and he told me then that hed moved beyond or away from Crimson. But he thought he knew how to win over Crimson fans with newer music. The League of Gentlemen a revival of the name of his first group in the early sixties seemed at first to be the path Fripp would take after his solo Frippertronics tour: a quirky new-waveish dance band, built in part around precessive interlocking patterns perhaps inspired by Balinese gamelan music. That band didnt last long, but Fripp put together a new band, Discipline, to further explore this precessive guitar approach, enlisting Adrian Belew on second guitar. (This band is captured on DISCIPLINE LIVE AT MOLES CLUB 1981, recorded on April 30, 1981 and released by the King Crimson Collectors Club as Club 11.) Soon Discipline became the new King Crimson, releasing three albums in 1981-1984. Was it really the new Crimson? Well, they played a few older pieces "Red," "Fracture," and particularly "Twenty-First Century Schizoid Man" in concert. But the new material (with the sole exception of "Larks Tongues Pt. III") bore no resemblance to that of previous Crimsons. Much of it was gamelan-based or -inspired, and the songs were written (all the lyrics and much of the music) by Belew. The quartet, which also included drummer Bill Bruford (from the Larks Tongues band) and bassist/Chapman Stick/Warr Guitar-player Tony Levin, was now half American. Belew sang the lyrics in an American accent. While this may have appealed to Fripp, who was looking for fresh directions and a fresh sound, it was less appealing to many of Crimsons fans, myself included. Call it prejudice on my part, but I dont think Americans have much to add to the lexicon of progressive rock. Lacking a European musical education, most Americans are better at boogying down than at ambitious music as most of the lame bands trying to produce American progressive rock have proved over and over. Theres something missing from the psyche of the American rocker, I guess. The United States offers the largest and one of the most enthusiastic audiences for progressive rock, but hasnt fielded a band worthy of international respect in this musical arena in decades. (Recently I saw a band which calls itself Blue Floyd and which does southern refried versions of Pink Floyds classic material. It was very disappointing. Despite the promise implicit in the concept, Blue Floyd reduced every piece they played to three-chord jams.) But Fripp rejects "progressive rock" as a genre and as a label for King Crimson. In Crimson he hears "the beast," and tries to evoke it and bring it out into play. The nineties Crimson, the "double trio" which produced VROOOM and THRAK, was two-thirds American. While Fripp pointed that edition of Crimson away from the interlocking guitars of the eighties, and revived unused themes from "Red" for "Vrooom" and "Thrak" themselves, most of the rest of the material was again written by Belew. Belew has written music for years for both his solo works and his former band, The Bears, much of which I like and not least for its Beatleish aspects. But for Crimson, while some of the Beatles influences remain, Belew seems to be writing somewhat differently than he does on his own. His lyrics in particular, seem to alternate between first person narration and lists of words apparently assembled from a thesaurus and offered in a stream-of-consciousness fashion. Neither offer the mystery or the wordplay of Sinfields lyrics for the original Crimson, and on repeated listening I find them growing tiresomely mannered. They are too American: too literal and often too banal. In the spring of 2000 King Crimson released two new albums. The "official" Crimson album is THE CONSTRUKCTION OF LIGHT, on Virgin. In addition theres the Projekct X album, HEAVEN AND EARTH, on DGM, with one track (the title track) from it included as a bonus track on CONSTRUKCTION.
The whole idea of the Projekcts was to "R&D" the next Crimson, via improvisations. And while those Projekcts produced some interesting improvisations and recordings, I dont hear much if any of their influence on THE CONSTRUKCTION OF LIGHT. The album is the work of a quartet again Bruford and Levin having been granted leaves of absence, Trey Gunn taking over bass duties. When this album was released it stirred up a storm on the King Crimson e-list, Elephant Talk, with listeners writing in to express their disappointment or pleasure in the album. Opinions varied remarkably, and bloodletting was only narrowly avoided between some correspondents. My own reaction falls between the extremes, but its fair to say that I find the album and the bands musical direction basically disappointing. To begin with, there is no new musical direction. So much for "R&D." In general, the albums music is highly mannered and narrowly focussed. Technically, this is admirably difficult to perform and very demanding music, but it is guitar music, full of pointillistic notes (at one point Fripp uses his guitar synthesizer to transform his solo into a piano solo, but it doesnt sound pianistic) and it occupies a narrow emotional spectrum. Two pieces, "FraKctured" and "Larks Tongues in Aspic Pt. IV," make direct references to the seventies Crimson with their titles, but offer a more abstract and less emotionally expressive music. The pieces which offered the original inspiration (and titles) have been reduced to elaborately performed riffs, heavy on technique but light on feeling. (Not that they are "light" musically the reverse. They are full of metalloid ponderousness.) The title piece offers both an instrumental section and a song section in which Belew amazingly enough dips into Yess "Close To The Edge" period for his vocal refrain (in which he again piles word upon word). The rest of the pieces are Belews songs. "ProzaKc Blues" uses a voice-treatment to lower and roughen Belews voice, while his lyrics blame depression on reading the posts in Elephant Talk (which he has elsewhere referred to as "turds"). While not a real blues (Fripp is well known for never playing real blues), the piece is probably the strongest new composition on the album. Belews "Into the Frying Pan" and "The Worlds My Oyster Soup Kitchen Floor Wax Museum" are lyrically weak (lots of words, signifying not very much), and typical musically of his contributions to the nineties Crimson like (the clumsily titled) "Sex Sleep Eat Drink Dream." "Larks Tongues IV" segues directly into "Coda: I Have a Dream," another Belew contribution. This, like the "Marine Coda" to "Vrooom," is a musically powerful circular piece which harks back once again to the coda to the Beatles seminal "Hey Jude." Unfortunately, the lyrics which attempt to sum up the 20th century are bald and banal, and cant touch Billy Joels "Fire" lyrics of a decade ago. Belew had wanted to precede "Larks Tongues IV" (which follows directly on the heavy ending of "Oyster Soup") with an acoustic version of "I Have a Dream," which would have offered a "breather" and set up the heavier coda. That makes sense to me, but it didnt to Virgin, and Fripp reportedly backed Virgins decision to exclude the acoustic prelude. Perhaps the lyrics stood out too nakedly in the acoustic version. (This is the first instance I can think of in which any record label exercised direct control over the content of a King Crimson album, something I doubt Fripp would countenance if he hadnt agreed with the outcome. Sometimes in a "democratic" or "leaderless" band which Fripp claims Crimson is an outside force is required to make and enforce such decisions .) The album concludes after a long pause before the final track with "Heaven and Earth" by Projekct X, a bonus track. One friend of mine claims its the only interesting track on the album. However, its somewhat atypical (lighter, more ethereal) of HEAVEN AND EARTH itself. That album is more in line with those of the earlier Projekcts, but Mastelotto has mixed it bits of studio conversations to create something of a montage. And early incipient versions of some of the material on CONSTRUKCTION can also be found there.
And Im getting really tired of the cute misspellings substituting "KC" for "C." It has worn very thin. The old Crimson didnt need to resort to such devices and I wish the new one didnt need to either. NOTE: In the fall of 1999 I wrote a five-part series on the history of King Crimson and its releases (including the information that, contrary to published reports, Robert Fripp had nothing to do with the pre-Giles, Giles & Fripp band called Brain, which released a single on Parlophone in 1967) for the Collecting Channel. This piece can now be found in the Bios, Histories & Discographies section of this site. There are considerably more historical and discographical details in those pieces than I have gotten into here, although portions overlap my earlier contributions here. |
Return to Dr.Progresso Back to Top
If you are interested in obtaining any of the music discussed in
this site, I welcome feedback on these pages. I can be reached directly at tedwhite@compusnet.com, or through cosmicat@holeintheweb.com. |